Oh, and how would mine grade against the EF in the guide? Just curious, I'm pretty sure the seller had mine listed as EF, too.
Thanks. If I can recall it, the seller's grading scale goes - P, G, F, VF, EF, MS, and UNC. Is this the common grading scale for non-U.S. coins? The seven-point scale I think I heard it called....
Quote from: FilthyBroke on February 06, 2010, 07:42:58 PMThanks. If I can recall it, the seller's grading scale goes - P, G, F, VF, EF, MS, and UNC. Is this the common grading scale for non-U.S. coins? The seven-point scale I think I heard it called.... FilthyBroke, 'MS' isn't part of the 7 point grading scale,as that is what the slabbers use.I hate the grade 'BU',as it is next to impossible to find a coin strictly in 'BU' grade.We use 'G','VG','F','VF','EF','Unc.',& both 'Proof-like' & 'Proof',even though both 'Proof-like' & 'Proof' aren't strictly speaking grades,but methods of striking.Yes,we don't use numbers to confuse people or to rip people off.Aidan.
And here it is - James I gold hammered quarter laurel -
FilthyBroke, That's one very nice piece of hammered English gold that you've got there.English (as opposed to British) gold coins are very difficult to find,but not as difficult to find as Scots hammered gold coins are.Yes,I do collect British Isles coins myself.Chris,we never use 'Poor' as a grade over here in New Zealand,but 'AU' is only ever occasionally used.What angers me about Krause sometimes,is when they give prices only in 'Unc.' &/or 'BU',but not in 'VF' downwards,it makes it impossible to work out prices when coins in the lower grades turn up.The classic case of this is with the American commemorative $1/2 from 1892 to 1954.We occasionally see the Columbian Exposition commemorative $1/2 over here,& in the bottom grades.Aidan.