What an odd design! I think the topper is that inpaled head "thing", very strange. Yet I keep looking.... As to your question, it would depend on how many come available and how often, I guess. Oh, and how much of course. I tend to buy and then hope for the upgrade, that way if it never surfaces, I'll still have my own example.
NOT A DILEMMA ANYMORE, STEF. I guess you've been dedilemmanated.Interesting that you kept it; I'm not surprised.Many collectors seek rarity.In Conders, I see four types of rarity...1. Design rarity, where only one or a few pieces exist with a particular design.Design rarity is great but I prefer more common tokens, ones that other collectors, after viewing my images, might seek to own a similar example,2. Mulings bearing particular design(s).3. Edge rarity. Lettered, milled left or right, engrailed, even a few scalloped Conder Token edges exist.Only if I were attempting to collect all of the edge variations for a particular die pairing would I be excited about the edges, other than preferring pristine details of whatever edge design. But the edges are very interesting to me, like both sides.This type of rarity holds little interest for me. I'd prefer to have a common token with the same design. I'd like it to be in stunning condition but often accept less.4. Condition rarity, aka eye appeal. Fabulous eye appeal and awesome grades sometimes bring more than numerical rarities. Some toned examples of coins and tokens bring 2-30 times book value when sold, carrying their value far beyond their numerical rarity.I had to check the spelling of dilemma and ran across this definition. In the Usage section, it sounds like they were talking about Bill McKivor. LOLI tend to avoid dillemae.